1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2009 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (305 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 287 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1483 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen 2CV | 2009 Jeep Commander | |
| Make | Citroen | Jeep |
| Model | 2CV | Commander |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 4701 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 305 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5650 RPM |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 2043 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1910 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1840 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 80 L |
