1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2009 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,777 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Wrangler (175 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 157 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1320 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen 2CV | 2009 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Citroen | Jeep |
| Model | 2CV | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 2777 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 175 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4230 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2430 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 66 L |
