1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2009 Kia Forte
To start off, 2009 Kia Forte is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Forte is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Forte (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Forte should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Forte weights approximately 668 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen 2CV | 2009 Kia Forte | |
| Make | Citroen | Kia |
| Model | 2CV | Forte |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 156 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1228 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4529 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1775 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1461 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2649 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 52 L |
