1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2009 Smart ForTwo
To start off, 2009 Smart ForTwo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 999 cc (3 cylinders), 2009 Smart ForTwo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Smart ForTwo (70 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Smart ForTwo should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen 2CV | 2009 Smart ForTwo | |
Make | Citroen | Smart |
Model | 2CV | ForTwo |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 70 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 2700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1570 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 1870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 33 L |