1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,792 cc, 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (247 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 1000 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen 2CV | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
| Make | Citroen | Cadillac |
| Model | 2CV | BLS |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 2792 cc |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 247 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1560 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4690 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1770 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 58 L |
