1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2010 Ford E-250
To start off, 2010 Ford E-250 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 4,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-250 (265 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 247 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1290 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen 2CV | 2010 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | 2CV | E-250 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 265 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1850 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4717 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1702 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2824 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 72 L |