1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2010 Kia Cadenza
To start off, 2010 Kia Cadenza is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,300 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Kia Cadenza is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Kia Cadenza (294 HP) has 276 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Kia Cadenza should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Kia Cadenza weights approximately 1015 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen 2CV | 2010 Kia Cadenza | |
Make | Citroen | Kia |
Model | 2CV | Cadenza |
Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 3300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 294 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1575 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4965 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2845 mm |