1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2010 Nissan Rogue
To start off, 2010 Nissan Rogue is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Nissan Rogue is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Nissan Rogue (170 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Rogue should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Nissan Rogue weights approximately 928 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen 2CV | 2010 Nissan Rogue | |
| Make | Citroen | Nissan |
| Model | 2CV | Rogue |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 170 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1488 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4646 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1801 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1659 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |
