1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2010 Subaru Outback
To start off, 2010 Subaru Outback is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Subaru Outback is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Subaru Outback (256 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Subaru Outback should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Subaru Outback weights approximately 1099 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen 2CV | 2010 Subaru Outback | |
| Make | Citroen | Subaru |
| Model | 2CV | Outback |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | boxer |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 256 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1659 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1821 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1669 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2741 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 70 L |
