1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen 2CV | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Citroen | Toyota |
| Model | 2CV | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 158 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1765 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1549 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2601 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 50 L |
