1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS (318 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 300 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1218 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen 2CV | 2012 Cadillac CTS | |
Make | Citroen | Cadillac |
Model | 2CV | CTS |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 318 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1778 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1842 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1422 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 68 L |