1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2012 Ford Kuga
To start off, 2012 Ford Kuga is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Ford Kuga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Kuga (197 HP) has 179 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Kuga should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen 2CV | 2012 Ford Kuga | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | 2CV | Kuga |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1720 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 53 L |
