1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2012 Mazda 5
To start off, 2012 Mazda 5 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,500 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Mazda 5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Mazda 5 (157 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 139 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Mazda 5 should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Mazda 5 weights approximately 990 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen 2CV | 2012 Mazda 5 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | 2CV | 5 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 157 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4585 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1615 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2751 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |