1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2012 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2012 Toyota Tundra is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 4,664 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Toyota Tundra (276 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 258 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 520 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen 2CV | 2012 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Citroen | Toyota |
| Model | 2CV | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 4664 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1080 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5340 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1940 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3230 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 100 L |
