1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ATS (268 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 250 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ATS should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 970 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen 2CV | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Citroen | Cadillac |
Model | 2CV | ATS |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1530 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1417 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2772 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 61 L |