1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE (397 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 379 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE weights approximately 2132 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen 2CV | 2013 Cadillac ESCALADE | |
| Make | Citroen | Cadillac |
| Model | 2CV | ESCALADE |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 6200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 397 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 2692 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 5639 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2009 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1892 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3302 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 117 L |
