1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2013 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2013 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Toyota 4Runner (266 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 248 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1599 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen 2CV | 2013 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | 2CV | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 266 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 2159 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 87 L |