1966 Citroen 2CV vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Volvo XC60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1966 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volvo XC60 weights approximately 1231 kg more than 1966 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen 2CV | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 2CV | XC60 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 237 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1791 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4627 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1891 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1713 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2774 mm |