1966 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 1983 Fiat Ritmo

To start off, 1983 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 1,116 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Fiat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (59 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1983 Fiat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Fiat Ritmo weights approximately 259 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1983 Fiat Ritmo (81 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 1983 Fiat Ritmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Citroen Ak 350.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Citroen Ak 350 1983 Fiat Ritmo
Make Citroen Fiat
Model Ak 350 Ritmo
Year Released 1966 1983
Engine Size 600 cc 1116 cc
Engine Cylinders 2 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 22 HP 59 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5800 RPM
Torque 41 Nm 81 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 8.8:1 9.2:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Vehicle Weight 605 kg 864 kg
Vehicle Length 3610 mm 3940 mm
Vehicle Width 1490 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1710 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2410 mm 2460 mm