1966 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 1996 Mahindra Armada
To start off, 1996 Mahindra Armada is newer by 30 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 2,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Mahindra Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Mahindra Armada (74 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Mahindra Armada should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Mahindra Armada weights approximately 1395 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1996 Mahindra Armada is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Mahindra Armada will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen Ak 350 | 1996 Mahindra Armada | |
| Make | Citroen | Mahindra |
| Model | Ak 350 | Armada |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1996 |
| Engine Size | 600 cc | 2299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 22 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 605 kg | 2000 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4310 mm |
