1966 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2004 Volvo S40

To start off, 2004 Volvo S40 is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 1,950 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo S40 (170 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 148 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Volvo S40 weights approximately 650 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo S40 (240 Nm) has 199 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm). This means 2004 Volvo S40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Citroen Ak 350.

Compare all specifications:

1966 Citroen Ak 350 2004 Volvo S40
Make Citroen Volvo
Model Ak 350 S40
Year Released 1966 2004
Engine Size 600 cc 1950 cc
Engine Cylinders 2 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 22 HP 170 HP
Engine RPM 4500 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 41 Nm 240 Nm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.8:1 9.0:1
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 605 kg 1255 kg
Vehicle Length 3610 mm 4530 mm
Vehicle Width 1490 mm 1720 mm
Vehicle Height 1710 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2410 mm 2650 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.9 L/100km 9.6 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 19 L 60 L