1966 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2005 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2005 Dodge Ram is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 8,276 cc (10 cylinders), 2005 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Dodge Ram (494 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 472 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Dodge Ram weights approximately 1867 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Dodge Ram (691 Nm) has 650 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm). This means 2005 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen Ak 350 | 2005 Dodge Ram | |
| Make | Citroen | Dodge |
| Model | Ak 350 | Ram |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 600 cc | 8276 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 22 HP | 494 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 41 Nm | 691 Nm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 605 kg | 2472 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 5790 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2040 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1900 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3580 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 23.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 98 L |
