1966 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2005 Seat Inca Kombi
To start off, 2005 Seat Inca Kombi is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 1,391 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Seat Inca Kombi is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Seat Inca Kombi (59 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 37 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Seat Inca Kombi should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Seat Inca Kombi weights approximately 430 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Seat Inca Kombi (107 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 66 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm @ 2800 RPM). This means 2005 Seat Inca Kombi will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen Ak 350 | 2005 Seat Inca Kombi | |
| Make | Citroen | Seat |
| Model | Ak 350 | Inca Kombi |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Engine Size | 600 cc | 1391 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 22 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 41 Nm | 107 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 605 kg | 1035 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1650 mm |
