1966 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Holden UTE is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden UTE (242 HP) has 220 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden UTE should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ak 350.
Because 2009 Holden UTE is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Holden UTE. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Citroen Ak 350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden UTE (330 Nm) has 289 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm). This means 2009 Holden UTE will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen Ak 350 | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | Ak 350 | UTE |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Size | 600 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 41 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |