1966 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 2009 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2009 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 3,980 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Wrangler (172 HP) has 150 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. (22 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 1438 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Wrangler (296 Nm) has 255 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm). This means 2009 Jeep Wrangler will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen Ak 350 | 2009 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Citroen | Jeep |
| Model | Ak 350 | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
| Engine Size | 600 cc | 3980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 22 HP | 172 HP |
| Torque | 41 Nm | 296 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 605 kg | 2043 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1820 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2640 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 14.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 19 L | 72 L |
