1966 Citroen Ami vs. 1962 DKW Munga
To start off, 1966 Citroen Ami is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 DKW Munga would be higher. At 979 cc (3 cylinders), 1962 DKW Munga is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 DKW Munga (43 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 DKW Munga weights approximately 486 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1962 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1962 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen Ami | 1962 DKW Munga | |
| Make | Citroen | DKW |
| Model | Ami | Munga |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 979 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.7:1 | 8.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 624 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3450 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1820 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1760 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2010 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 31 L |
