1966 Citroen Ami vs. 1969 Datsun 1600
To start off, 1969 Datsun 1600 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Datsun 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1969 Datsun 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Datsun 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen Ami | 1969 Datsun 1600 | |
| Make | Citroen | Datsun |
| Model | Ami | 1600 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1969 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 601 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
