1966 Citroen Ami vs. 1974 Mitsubishi Minica
To start off, 1974 Mitsubishi Minica is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 601 cc (2 cylinders), 1966 Citroen Ami is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 26 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Citroen Ami weights approximately 160 kg more than 1974 Mitsubishi Minica.
Because 1974 Mitsubishi Minica is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1974 Mitsubishi Minica. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen Ami | 1974 Mitsubishi Minica | |
| Make | Citroen | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Ami | Minica |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1974 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 601 cc | 359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 26 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 460 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1310 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1290 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2010 mm |
