1966 Citroen Ami vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 1976 Volvo 66 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,289 cc (4 cylinders), 1976 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1976 Volvo 66 (56 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1976 Volvo 66 should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami.
Because 1976 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen Ami | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | Ami | 66 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 601 cc | 1289 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 56 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1550 mm |
