1966 Citroen Ami vs. 1978 Volvo 66
To start off, 1978 Volvo 66 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,108 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Volvo 66 (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Volvo 66 should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Volvo 66 weights approximately 196 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1978 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen Ami | 1978 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | Ami | 66 |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 624 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1390 mm |
