1966 Citroen Ami vs. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 860 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami.
Because 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen Ami | 1980 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Citroen | Oldsmobile |
Model | Ami | Cutlass |
Year Released | 1966 | 1980 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 601 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2760 mm |