1966 Citroen Ami vs. 1982 Seat Ritmo
To start off, 1982 Seat Ritmo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,196 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Seat Ritmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Seat Ritmo (63 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 39 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Seat Ritmo should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Seat Ritmo weights approximately 256 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen Ami | 1982 Seat Ritmo | |
Make | Citroen | Seat |
Model | Ami | Ritmo |
Year Released | 1966 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1196 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 63 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 624 kg | 880 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2460 mm |