1966 Citroen Ami vs. 1998 Ford Ranger
To start off, 1998 Ford Ranger is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher.
Because 1998 Ford Ranger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1998 Ford Ranger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen Ami | 1998 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Citroen | Ford |
| Model | Ami | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
