1966 Citroen Ami vs. 1998 Mazda Laputa
To start off, 1998 Mazda Laputa is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 657 cc (3 cylinders), 1998 Mazda Laputa is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mazda Laputa (52 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mazda Laputa should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mazda Laputa weights approximately 130 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen Ami | 1998 Mazda Laputa | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | Ami | Laputa |
Year Released | 1966 | 1998 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 601 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 30 L |