1966 Citroen Ami vs. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv
To start off, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv (276 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv weights approximately 626 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen Ami | 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | Ami | RX-Evolv |
| Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 2616 cc |
| Engine Type | boxer | dual-disk rotary |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 276 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 9000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 624 kg | 1250 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1360 mm |
