1966 Citroen Ami vs. 1999 Renault Scenic
To start off, 1999 Renault Scenic is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,870 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Renault Scenic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Renault Scenic (136 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Renault Scenic should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Renault Scenic weights approximately 771 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen Ami | 1999 Renault Scenic | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | Ami | Scenic |
Year Released | 1966 | 1999 |
Body Type | Sedan | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 624 kg | 1395 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 8.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 60 L |