1966 Citroen Ami vs. 2000 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2000 Dodge Durango is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 4,702 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Dodge Durango (232 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 206 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Dodge Durango weights approximately 1355 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2000 Dodge Durango is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Dodge Durango will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen Ami | 2000 Dodge Durango | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | Ami | Durango |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 601 cc | 4702 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 232 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 68 L |