1966 Citroen Ami vs. 2000 Ford Taurus
To start off, 2000 Ford Taurus is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,933 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Taurus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Taurus (156 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Taurus should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Taurus weights approximately 901 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen Ami | 2000 Ford Taurus | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | Ami | Taurus |
Year Released | 1966 | 2000 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 601 cc | 2933 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1521 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 68 L |