1966 Citroen Ami vs. 2001 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2001 Toyota Mark II is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,988 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Toyota Mark II is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Toyota Mark II (156 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Mark II should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Toyota Mark II weights approximately 940 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Toyota Mark II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Toyota Mark II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen Ami | 2001 Toyota Mark II | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | Ami | Mark II |
Year Released | 1966 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 601 cc | 1988 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 156 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4740 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 13.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 70 L |