1966 Citroen Ami vs. 2002 Donkervoort D8
To start off, 2002 Donkervoort D8 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,780 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Donkervoort D8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Donkervoort D8 (148 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 122 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Donkervoort D8 should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Donkervoort D8 weights approximately 5 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Donkervoort D8 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Donkervoort D8. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen Ami | 2002 Donkervoort D8 | |
Make | Citroen | Donkervoort |
Model | Ami | D8 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 601 cc | 1780 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2310 mm |