1966 Citroen Ami vs. 2002 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2002 Toyota Tundra is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 4,698 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Toyota Tundra (245 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 299 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Toyota Tundra is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Toyota Tundra. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1966 Citroen Ami, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen Ami | 2002 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | Ami | Tundra |
Year Released | 1966 | 2002 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 4698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 245 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 624 kg | 923 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1800 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3270 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 70 L |