1966 Citroen Ami vs. 2003 Acura RSX
To start off, 2003 Acura RSX is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Acura RSX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Acura RSX (160 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 134 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Acura RSX should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Acura RSX weights approximately 602 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen Ami | 2003 Acura RSX | |
Make | Citroen | Acura |
Model | Ami | RSX |
Year Released | 1966 | 2003 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 601 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 160 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1222 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 50 L |