1966 Citroen Ami vs. 2004 Toyota Sequoia
To start off, 2004 Toyota Sequoia is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 4,671 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Sequoia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Toyota Sequoia (240 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 216 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Sequoia should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Sequoia weights approximately 1689 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen Ami | 2004 Toyota Sequoia | |
| Make | Citroen | Toyota |
| Model | Ami | Sequoia |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 602 cc | 4671 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 24 HP | 240 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.7:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 624 kg | 2313 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5210 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1990 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1930 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3100 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 99 L |
