1966 Citroen Ami vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2005 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 3,950 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota 4Runner (245 HP @ 3400 RPM) has 219 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 1226 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen Ami | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Citroen | Toyota |
| Model | Ami | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 601 cc | 3950 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 245 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 3400 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1846 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4810 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1880 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 87 L |
