1966 Citroen Ami vs. 2008 Daihatsu Sirion
To start off, 2008 Daihatsu Sirion is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,296 cc (4 cylinders), 2008 Daihatsu Sirion is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Daihatsu Sirion (86 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Daihatsu Sirion should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Daihatsu Sirion weights approximately 316 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen Ami | 2008 Daihatsu Sirion | |
Make | Citroen | Daihatsu |
Model | Ami | Sirion |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 86 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.7:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 624 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2440 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 5.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 40 L |