1966 Citroen Ami vs. 2008 Honda Odyssey
To start off, 2008 Honda Odyssey is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 3,471 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Honda Odyssey is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 Honda Odyssey (241 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 Honda Odyssey should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Honda Odyssey weights approximately 734 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen Ami | 2008 Honda Odyssey | |
| Make | Citroen | Honda |
| Model | Ami | Odyssey |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 601 cc | 3471 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 241 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1354 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3010 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 79 L |
