1966 Citroen Ami vs. 2008 Jeep Wrangler
To start off, 2008 Jeep Wrangler is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 3,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2008 Jeep Wrangler is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Jeep Wrangler weights approximately 930 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami.
Because 2008 Jeep Wrangler is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Jeep Wrangler will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1966 Citroen Ami | 2008 Jeep Wrangler | |
| Make | Citroen | Jeep |
| Model | Ami | Wrangler |
| Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
| Body Type | Station Wagon | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 601 cc | 3966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 26 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1550 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2380 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 72 L |
