1966 Citroen Ami vs. 2008 Toyota Condor
To start off, 2008 Toyota Condor is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,436 cc, 2008 Toyota Condor is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Toyota Condor weights approximately 1022 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami.
Because 2008 Toyota Condor is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1966 Citroen Ami. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Toyota Condor will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen Ami | 2008 Toyota Condor | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | Ami | Condor |
Year Released | 1966 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2436 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 0 HP |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.7:1 | 8.8:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 624 kg | 1646 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 7.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 70 L |