1966 Citroen Ami vs. 2009 Kia Cee'd
To start off, 2009 Kia Cee'd is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,582 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Kia Cee'd is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Kia Cee'd (114 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (24 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Kia Cee'd should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Kia Cee'd weights approximately 734 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen Ami | 2009 Kia Cee'd | |
Make | Citroen | Kia |
Model | Ami | Cee'd |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1582 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.7:1 | 17.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 624 kg | 1358 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2660 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 53 L |