1966 Citroen Ami vs. 2009 Lada 110
To start off, 2009 Lada 110 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,499 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Lada 110 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Lada 110 (76 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1966 Citroen Ami. (26 HP @ 4750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Lada 110 should accelerate faster than 1966 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Lada 110 weights approximately 475 kg more than 1966 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1966 Citroen Ami | 2009 Lada 110 | |
Make | Citroen | Lada |
Model | Ami | 110 |
Year Released | 1966 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 601 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 26 HP | 76 HP |
Engine RPM | 4750 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 7.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 43 L |